<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concorde on Transportational.com</title>
    <link>https://transportational.com/tags/concorde/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Concorde on Transportational.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://transportational.com/tags/concorde/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Boom Supersonic&#39;s Overture Targets Production in Two Years as Congress Moves to Lift the Overland Boom Ban</title>
      <link>https://transportational.com/boom-supersonics-overture-targets-production-in-two-years-as-congress-moves-to-lift-the-overland-boom-ban/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://transportational.com/boom-supersonics-overture-targets-production-in-two-years-as-congress-moves-to-lift-the-overland-boom-ban/</guid>
      <description>More than two decades after Concorde&amp;rsquo;s final flight, commercial supersonic travel has a credible successor on a defined timeline, and US policy is finally moving to accommodate it. Boom Supersonic CEO Blake Scholl said in April 2026 that the company expects to begin production of its Overture airliner in about two years, a claim precise enough to invite real scrutiny rather than concept-art skepticism.
The regulatory unlock. On March 24, 2026, the US House passed the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act, built around a single principle: if an operator can demonstrate a flight won&amp;rsquo;t produce a sonic boom audible at ground level, the FAA should permit it — reversing the core logic of the 1973 ban on civil supersonic flight over land that helped confine Concorde to ocean routes and choke its route economics.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
